

- #Syncthing run as administrator update#
- #Syncthing run as administrator windows 10#
- #Syncthing run as administrator android#

#Syncthing run as administrator windows 10#
Migrating from Windows 10 Mobile? Here's why you should consider Android.Google launch Android Enterprise Recommended for Managed Service Providers.February was an interesting month for OEMConfig.Joining the Android Enterprise Experts community.UEM tools managing Android-powered cars.MWC 2019: Mid-range devices excel, 5G everything, form-factors galore and Android Enterprise.Android Enterprise in Q/10: features and clarity on DA deprecation.I'm joining Social Mobile as Director of Android Innovation.Why I moved from Google WiFi to Netgear Orbi.Dabbling with Android Enterprise in Q beta 3.The Huawei ban and Enterprise: what now?.Android Enterprise Partner Summit 2019 highlights.The Bayton 2019 Android Enterprise experience survey.VMware WS supports Android Enterprise enrolments on closed networks and AOSP devices.Why Intune doesn't support Android Enterprise COPE.The decade that redefined Android in the enterprise.Android Enterprise in 11: Google reduces visibility and control with COPE to bolster privacy.Google's Android Management API will soon support COPE.Listen again: BM podcast #144 - Jason Bayton & Russ Mohr talk Android!.Watch: An Android Enterprise discussion with Hypergate.Google launch the Android Enterprise Help Community.VMware announces end of support for Device Admin.Google announce big changes to zero-touch.
#Syncthing run as administrator update#
AER dropped the 3/5 year update mandate with Android 11, where are we now?.

It is also impossible to control services without administrative access, unless you fiddle around with service permissions, which itself requires administrative access to begin with 😉.Ī built-in service functionality would be a replacement/alternative for the current NSSM solution though. Otherwise, a normal service runs system-wide, which is usually not suitable for Syncthing, unless we are talking about a single-user machine. It would need to be run as a per-user service (see ), which is available only in Windows 10 and up.

Might be an option to implement that ourselves and recommend running as a service instead. I will try to add the warning sometime this week. We should probably add a warning about that to the docs. You would need a second task to poll the state of the first one and act on it, which is convoluted and prone to errors. Yeah, it would be nice to be able to run custom commands on task end, but there is no such functionality in Task Scheduler. The best info I found on this says it's not possible and suggest using taskkill instead I will think of a possible workaround using Task Scheduler, but with the current monitor-main process construct, there may be none. the user thinks that they have made Syncthing exit, while in reality the synchronisation is still going on invisibly in background. On the other hand, the current state makes it impossible to simply shut Syncthing down using Task Scheduler, which is also not good from the user's perspective, i.e. I do not think that there is any solution to the problem right now, as running Syncthing with the -no-restart option would prevent automatic updates and other panic recoveries, which I do not think is desirable. Thus, ending the task only kills the monitor process, but leaves the main one untouched. The higher one is the monitor process (see ), and only this one is controlled by Task Scheduler. The reason is that Syncthing spawns a sub-process, so that there are two syncthing.exe processes running at the time. When using the recommended way to set Syncthing up to automatically start and run in background in Windows with Task Scheduler following the official guide under, ending the task does not stop Syncthing from running in background.
